NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
United States v. Jacobi Shelton Washington
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED
BeforeCOLE, KETHLEDGE, and MATHIS, Circuit Judges.
View the official PDF → · unofficial reading copy; the court’s PDF controls
MATHIS, Circuit Judge. Jacobi Washington pleaded guilty to possessing cocaine with intent to distribute it and possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug-trafficking offense. The district court sentenced Washington to 195 months’ imprisonment after determining that he was a career offender under the Sentencing Guidelines. Washington argues that the district court erred by enhancing his sentence under the career-offender guideline. We disagree, and so we affirm.
A defendant qualifies as a career offender if the government can show three things. First, the defendant must have been at least eighteen years old when he “committed the instant offense of conviction.” U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1(a). Second, the offense of conviction must be a “felony that is either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense.” Id. And three, the defendant must have “at least two prior felony convictions of either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense.” Id.
Washington disputes only the third requirement. Washington has a 2012 federal drug conviction and a 2018 conviction for delivery or manufacture of cocaine under Michigan law. He argues that his Michigan drug conviction is not a controlled substance offense under the Guidelines because, at the time of that conviction, Michigan’s definition of cocaine criminalized more conduct than the federal-law cocaine definition.
Our precedent forecloses Washington’s argument. A “controlled substance offense” under the Guidelines includes “an offense under federal or state law . . . that prohibits the manufacture, import, export, distribution, or dispensing of a controlled substance.” Id. § 4B1.2(b) (2018) (emphasis added). We have construed this provision to mean that “state-law controlled substance offenses need not define controlled substances according to the Controlled Substances Act to count under § 4B1.2(b).” United States v. Jones, 81 F.4th 591, 598 (6th Cir. 2023). Thus, Washington’s Michigan drug conviction counts as a controlled substance offense. With two prior convictions for controlled substance offenses, the district court properly applied the career-offender guideline.
To his credit, Washington acknowledges that Jones binds us. See Salmi v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 774 F.2d 685, 689 (6th Cir. 1985).
We AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.